One of our best American writers, Elmore Leonard, has famously said that he tries to “leave out the parts people skip” when he’s writing. Anyone who has read a Leonard novel knows that they are lean, move quickly, and certainly don’t require any skimming.
But what exactly does that mean?
People start skimming when they lose interest. When they want you to get on with things. When they’re not as engaged by the story as they should be.
So how do you keep them engaged? I have a few ideas:
Keep your prose style simple and economic and clear
You can certainly be clever and artistic, but never sacrifice economy and clarity for the sake of “art.” Much of that art, in fact, is writing in a way that the sentences and paragraphs and pages flow from one to the next, giving the reader no choice but to hang onto every word.
And clarity is always important. If a reader is confused about what is going on, she may well give up on you.
Don’t bog your story down with too much description
Descriptive passages can be quite beautiful, but your job is to weigh whether or not they’re necessary. Poetic writing is often wonderful, but are you slowing the story down?
Gregory MacDonald, the author of the Fletch books, among others, once said that because we live in a “post-television” world, it is no longer necessary to use the amount of description needed in the past. We all know what the Statue of Liberty looks like because we’ve seen it on TV. We’ve seen just about everything on TV, and probably even more on the Internet.
So, I think it’s best to limit your descriptions to only what is absolutely necessary to make the story work. Meaning: enough to set the scene, set up a character, or to CLARIFY an action.
Let’s face it. Saying something as simple as, The place was a dump. Several used syringes lay on the floor next to a ratty mattress with half its stuffing gone is often more than enough to get the message across.
If you can, describe a setting through the eyes of whatever character controls the scene (meaning POV). If you include the description as part of that character’s thought process, colored by his or her mood or personality, the description then becomes much more dynamic and also reveals a lot about that character.
One man’s dump, after all, may be another man’s paradise. And showing how a character reacts to a place is much more interesting than a static description.
Tease your readers
One of the biggest mistakes I see aspiring writers make is that they try to reveal too much about character motivation and story too soon. Your job – as crass as it might sound – is to manipulate your reader. To keep her reading. Turning those pages.
Imagine meeting someone for the first time and they tell you everything there is to know about them. Where they were born, where they went to school, how many affairs they’ve had, how many brothers and sisters, their favorite color, their favorite food –
– you get the point.
What makes people interesting to us is that all of these things are revealed over a long period of time. We get to know them gradually, rather than all at once. They are a mystery that we have to unravel.
The same holds true with storytelling. You manipulate your readers by constantly creating questions in their minds. Why is she doing that? Where is she going? What happened to her in the past that makes her afraid of confronting him?
If we know it all up front, we”ll lose interest fast.
Give your characters a series of goals
Most stories will involve a central character who wants something. In a thriller, for instance, that may be something very big. The hero wants to stop the bad guy from, say, blowing up the federal building.
But if that’s all the story is about, then I’m yawning already.
If you give the hero a series of goals, smaller points he or she must reach – both internally and externally – before finally reaching that ultimate goal, then your reader will never lose interest.
A great example is the third DIE HARD movie. DIE HARD WITH A VENGEANCE.
The bad guy has something nefarious up his sleeve. But in order to distract the police from that ultimate goal, he sends them on a series of wild goose chases involving high explosives. Because our heroes are moving from one goal to the next, we’re never bored. In fact, we spend much of our time on the edge of our seat.
In the meantime, the main hero suspects that something is up, and as he tries to puzzle it out, we’re right there with him. We have only as much information as he has, so we’re not about to abandon ship until he (and we) knows the truth.
But more importantly, we also have a dynamic relationship playing out on screen between two characters played by Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson. These two men must work together reluctantly, and because we find them engaging, our stake in the outcome of the story is even higher.
Which brings me to my final point:
Create compelling characters
If you don’t create characters who are interesting in themselves, who have internal struggles we can relate to, who have fears we understand, who have a goal that makes sense to us on a personal level, then it doesn’t matter how cleverly you plot your novel. We won’t care.
If you need help creating compelling characters, take a look at my article on Creating Characters that Jump Off the Page.
Hopefully all of the above will help you “leave out the parts people skip.” And if you want to find out how the master himself does it, go pick up an Elmore Leonard novel today.
But be warned. He does it so well, it’s seamless. So you’ll have to pay close attention…










Dana King on 26 June, 2009 at 12:11 pm said:
Another keeper. This is a concise and informative article that some would take a whole book to describe, thus ironically creating in their own book a lot of parts people skip.
I love Chandler, and I read all his descriptions because I fall in love with the language every time I do. (General Sternwood’s first appearance in THE BIG SLEEP is a prime example.) That being said, you just about have to be that good to pull it off. James Lee Burke can do it, not too many others, and yes, lengthy descriptions then become parts to be skipped.
Have you considered pulling these together into a book once their combined lengths reach critical mass? They’re very well done.
Naomi on 2 July, 2009 at 3:57 am said:
Hmmm… I’ve been pondering on this topic myself, lately. I’ve noticed that I tend to leave out ALL the bits that I skip when I read a book – which means my writing tends to be very lean. I’ve been worrying that it’s closer to anorexic. But then, I was brought up on the old stuff – 19th-century ‘classics’ which are heavy on the description. Maybe I’m on the right path after all
Sana Rose on 1 July, 2011 at 5:57 am said:
Ever since I began writing at 14, I was uncertain about my story writing. I’m a reader who leaves out long descriptions but now try my best to read them in the interest of my writing.
As for my writing, I tend to have so much conversation or thoughts of the character in POV. And I was afraid I had too little description, but this article has made me confident. Thanks Rob!
Pam Stack on 12 August, 2012 at 7:32 am said:
Well said Robert, particularly the part about bogging down the reader with too much stuff. As an avid reader and an editor, I can most assuredly state that these things will drive a reader away from a book quickly. The story becomes boring. I don’t need a description of a lamppost that some dude is leaning against or the exact shade down to the chemical description of a lipstick color to get the idea…… Thanks.